{"id":4826,"date":"2016-03-13T15:13:36","date_gmt":"2016-03-13T15:13:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.pmstudios.co.uk\/blog\/?p=4826"},"modified":"2016-03-13T15:13:36","modified_gmt":"2016-03-13T15:13:36","slug":"bw-film-testing-2-grain-and-contrast-range","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.pmstudios.co.uk\/blog\/?p=4826","title":{"rendered":"B&#038;W film testing &#8211; 2) grain and contrast range"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>One of the reasons I tried out a B&amp;W film was to see what the grain structure was like and to see what the contrast range (dynamic range) was like. These images are macro &#8216;raw&#8217; photographs of the original negatives (to get the maximum detail that I could. First, the grain:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-large wp-image-4827\" src=\"http:\/\/www.pmstudios.co.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/M101_13t1crop1-600x400.jpg\" alt=\"film crop\" width=\"600\" height=\"400\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.pmstudios.co.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/M101_13t1crop1-600x400.jpg 600w, https:\/\/www.pmstudios.co.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/M101_13t1crop1-150x100.jpg 150w, https:\/\/www.pmstudios.co.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/M101_13t1crop1-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.pmstudios.co.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/M101_13t1crop1-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.pmstudios.co.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/M101_13t1crop1.jpg 830w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 709px) 85vw, (max-width: 909px) 67vw, (max-width: 984px) 61vw, (max-width: 1362px) 45vw, 600px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Hmmm. This was decent, medium speed film (Ilford XP2 400) so I was surprised at how much grain there was. I would be disappointed with a digital camera giving the same amount of noise as this at the same film speed.<\/p>\n<p>As an aside, I used to work for Ilford Films when they first introduced the XP type B&amp;W films. It was revolutionary at the time because it was a B&amp;W film that used the colour film print technology.<\/p>\n<p>Dynamic range. One test for this was to do a 3-shot bracketed exposure set at 2 stop intervals. These have had basic exposure and contrast adjustments to see how they fare:\u00a0 <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-large wp-image-4829\" src=\"http:\/\/www.pmstudios.co.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/M101_12t1crop2-600x396.jpg\" alt=\"Under exposed\" width=\"600\" height=\"396\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.pmstudios.co.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/M101_12t1crop2-600x396.jpg 600w, https:\/\/www.pmstudios.co.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/M101_12t1crop2-150x99.jpg 150w, https:\/\/www.pmstudios.co.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/M101_12t1crop2-300x198.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.pmstudios.co.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/M101_12t1crop2-768x507.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.pmstudios.co.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/M101_12t1crop2.jpg 900w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 709px) 85vw, (max-width: 909px) 67vw, (max-width: 984px) 61vw, (max-width: 1362px) 45vw, 600px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>This is under exposed and there is no detail in the shadows.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-large wp-image-4830\" src=\"http:\/\/www.pmstudios.co.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/M101_13t1crop2-600x396.jpg\" alt=\"standard exposed\" width=\"600\" height=\"396\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.pmstudios.co.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/M101_13t1crop2-600x396.jpg 600w, https:\/\/www.pmstudios.co.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/M101_13t1crop2-150x99.jpg 150w, https:\/\/www.pmstudios.co.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/M101_13t1crop2-300x198.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.pmstudios.co.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/M101_13t1crop2-768x507.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.pmstudios.co.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/M101_13t1crop2.jpg 900w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 709px) 85vw, (max-width: 909px) 67vw, (max-width: 984px) 61vw, (max-width: 1362px) 45vw, 600px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>This us the standard exposure. Shadow detail is poor; you can just make out the window panes in the shadows.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-large wp-image-4828\" src=\"http:\/\/www.pmstudios.co.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/M101_14t1crop2-600x396.jpg\" alt=\"overexposed\" width=\"600\" height=\"396\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.pmstudios.co.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/M101_14t1crop2-600x396.jpg 600w, https:\/\/www.pmstudios.co.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/M101_14t1crop2-150x99.jpg 150w, https:\/\/www.pmstudios.co.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/M101_14t1crop2-300x198.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.pmstudios.co.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/M101_14t1crop2-768x507.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.pmstudios.co.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/M101_14t1crop2.jpg 930w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 709px) 85vw, (max-width: 909px) 67vw, (max-width: 984px) 61vw, (max-width: 1362px) 45vw, 600px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Over exposed: More detail in the shadows but still not brilliant.<\/p>\n<p>However, looking at the histogram for the standard exposure before any adjustments shows&#8230;<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-4833\" src=\"http:\/\/www.pmstudios.co.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/M101_13t1histogram.jpg\" alt=\"histogram\" width=\"219\" height=\"123\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.pmstudios.co.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/M101_13t1histogram.jpg 219w, https:\/\/www.pmstudios.co.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/M101_13t1histogram-150x84.jpg 150w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 219px) 85vw, 219px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>&#8230; the lack of contrast and range in the image. Here is is asis:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-large wp-image-4834\" src=\"http:\/\/www.pmstudios.co.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/M101_13t2-600x407.jpg\" alt=\"original\" width=\"600\" height=\"407\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.pmstudios.co.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/M101_13t2-600x407.jpg 600w, https:\/\/www.pmstudios.co.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/M101_13t2-150x102.jpg 150w, https:\/\/www.pmstudios.co.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/M101_13t2-300x204.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.pmstudios.co.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/M101_13t2-768x522.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.pmstudios.co.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/M101_13t2.jpg 913w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 709px) 85vw, (max-width: 909px) 67vw, (max-width: 984px) 61vw, (max-width: 1362px) 45vw, 600px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>More detail in the shadows, but rather flat looking.<\/p>\n<p>And just to see what happens, I tried merging them as an HDR set:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-large wp-image-4835\" src=\"http:\/\/www.pmstudios.co.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/M101_13t1_fm-600x404.jpg\" alt=\"fusion mapping\" width=\"600\" height=\"404\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.pmstudios.co.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/M101_13t1_fm-600x404.jpg 600w, https:\/\/www.pmstudios.co.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/M101_13t1_fm-150x101.jpg 150w, https:\/\/www.pmstudios.co.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/M101_13t1_fm-300x202.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.pmstudios.co.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/M101_13t1_fm-768x518.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.pmstudios.co.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/M101_13t1_fm.jpg 920w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 709px) 85vw, (max-width: 909px) 67vw, (max-width: 984px) 61vw, (max-width: 1362px) 45vw, 600px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>This is using the default (fusion) settings for the merge. I like this the best!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>One of the reasons I tried out a B&amp;W film was to see what the grain structure was like and to see what the contrast range (dynamic range) was like. These images are macro &#8216;raw&#8217; photographs of the original negatives (to get the maximum detail that I could. First, the grain: Hmmm. This was decent, &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.pmstudios.co.uk\/blog\/?p=4826\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;B&#038;W film testing &#8211; 2) grain and contrast range&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,65],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4826","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-photography","category-technical"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pmstudios.co.uk\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4826","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pmstudios.co.uk\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pmstudios.co.uk\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pmstudios.co.uk\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pmstudios.co.uk\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4826"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.pmstudios.co.uk\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4826\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4836,"href":"https:\/\/www.pmstudios.co.uk\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4826\/revisions\/4836"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pmstudios.co.uk\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4826"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pmstudios.co.uk\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4826"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pmstudios.co.uk\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4826"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}